Disaster risk management in colombia: method of generating forced displacement in the population?
Keywords:
natural disasters, disaster risk management, population resettlement, forced displacement, environmental displaced, clinical methodAbstract
This article describes the experiences of the case on resettlement of vulnerable populations in Colombia as part of relocation process of displaced people, urban development projects, urban renewal and prevention and care programs at risk, particularly focused on the last axis, which is dealing with this case from the clinical methodology where students of the Public Interest Law Clinic UNAULA out of traditional legal education and face a real case that has allowed them to actively participate in strategic litigation before the Commission American Commission on Human Rights. For this, at first the operation of the disaster risk management in Colombia and the different events between the years 2000-2014 have marked the history of natural disasters in the country explained. Second figure of forced population displacement as it is addressed and is triggered in inadequate risk management, to conclude that the latter issue is compounded by other events in the country, to increase the number of displaced in Colombia, then increasing rates of violation of constitutional rights of citizens.
References
Agudelo, O. (2009). “Inundaciones en Colombia: un desastre que no es natural”. Un Periódico. Recuperado de http://www.unperiodico.unal.edu.co/en/dper/article/inundaciones-en-colombia-un-desastre-que-no-es-natural.html
Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID) (2010). “Indicadores de riesgo de desastre y de gestión de riesgos: programa para América Latina y el Caribe”. Recuperado de http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=35160024.
Banco Mundial (2012). “Resumen ejecutivo. Análisis de la gestión del riesgo de desastres en Colombia: un aporte para la construcción de políticas públicas”. Recuperado de http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/07/03/000020953_20120703135517/Rendered/INDEX/701030ESW0P1290ESTI0N0DEL0RIESGOweb.txt.
Brende, B. y Burkhater, D. (2015). “Prólogo”. Migraciones forzadas (49), pp. 4-6.
CEPAL (2006). “Gestión de riesgos en Colombia: Capítulo V”. Recuperado de http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/8/33658/colombiacapv.pdf
Chardon, A. y González, J. (2002). “Amenaza, vulnerabilidad, riesgo, desastre, mitigación, prevención: primer acercamiento a conceptos, características y metodologías de análisis y evaluación”. Recuperado de http://idea.unalmzl.edu.co/documentos/Anne-Catherine%20fase%20I.pdf.
Colombia Humanitaria (s.f.). Estudio de caso. Colombia humanitaria. Bogotá: Fondo Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres. Recuperado de http://www.colombiahumanitaria.gov.co/FNC/Documents/2014/estudio_caso.pdf
Congreso de la República de Colombia (1997). “Ley N.o 387. Por la cual se adoptan medidas para la prevención del desplazamiento forzado; la atención, protección, consolidación y estabilización socioeconómica de los desplazados internos por la violencia en la República de Colombia”. Diario Oficial N.o 43.091. Bogotá, Colombia: Congreso de la República.
Defensoría del Pueblo (2011). “Informe defensorial emergencia en Colombia por el fenómeno de la niña 2010-2011”.. Recuperado de https://www.google.com.co/url?sa=t&rct=j&-q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CBsQFjAAahUKEwjs9sew1qvIAhWFsh4KHfdBBeI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defensoria.gov.co%2Fattachment%2F36%-2FEmergencia%2520en%2520Colombia%2520por%2520el%2520fen%25C3%25B3meno%-2520de%2520la%2520ni%25C3%25B1a.pdf&usg=AFQjCNF6eHdJv4HNefQaFcQ6plC55fM-51g&sig2=2jAtX-mr7lc9BNlGnm8gwg.
Díaz (2007). “Metodología interdisciplinaria desde el estudio de la problemática ambiental del tramo urbano de la cuenca del río Consota: Hacia el fortalecimiento de la gestión ambiental local”. Tesis de grado para optar al título de Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo. Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
García, C. M., Aguirre, A. M. y Álvarez, J. R. (2014). “Desplazamiento ambiental: aportes conceptuales, metodológicos y normativos como base para su comprensión y reconocimiento en las agendas públicas”. En: J. G. Valencia (ed.). Cambio climático y desplazamiento ambiental forzado: estudio de caso en la Ecoregión Eje Cafetero en Colombia (pp. 48-101). Colombia, Armenia: Universidad La Gran Colombia.
Hernández, C. (2010). “Vulnerabilidad ante los desastres”. Revista 04. Recuperado de http://www.cienciayjuego.com/jhome/index.php/sala-/113-vulnerabilidad-ante-los-desastres.
International Association for the Study of Forced Migration (IASFM) (2012). What is forced migration? Inglaterra, Londres: International Association for the Study of Forced Migration. Recuperado de http://www.forcedmigration.org/about/whatisfm/what-is-forced-migration.
International Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) (2014). Global overview 2014. People internally displaced by conflict and violence. Suiza, Ginebra: IDMC. Recuperado de http://www.internal-displacement.org/assets/publications/2014/201405-global-overview-2014-en.pdf.
Jaimes, J. P. (2014). “El desplazamiento forzado en Colombia”. Anales de la cátedra Francisco Suárez, (48), pp. 257-275.
Kälin, W. (2012). “De los Principios de Nansen a la Iniciativa Nansen”. Migraciones forzadas (41). Recuperado de http://www.fmreview.org/es/prevencion/kaelin.
Kälin, W. (2015). “La Iniciativa Nansen: crear consenso sobre el desplazamiento en el contexto de los desastres”. Migraciones forzadas (49), pp. 5-7.
Lampis, A. (2010). “Pobreza y riesgo medio ambiental: un problema de vulnerabilidad y desarrollo”. Recuperado de http://www.desenredando.org/public/varios/2010/2010-08-30_Lampis_2010_Pobreza_y_Riesgo_Medio_Ambiental_Un_Problema_de_Desarrollo.pdf.
Piers, B., Terry, C., Davis, I. y Wisner, B. (1996). Vulnerabilidad. El entorno social, político y económico de los desastres. Perú, Lima: Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres de América Latina.
Sarmiento, J. P. (2015). “Editorial. Desplazamiento interno por proyectos de desarrollo”. Revista de Derecho, Universidad del Norte (44), pp. vii -x.
Silva, J. (2015). “Tres de cada diez colombianos están expuestos a desastres”. Recuperado de http://www.eltiempo.com/estilo-de-vida/ciencia/colombianos-estan-expuestos-a-desastres/15812223.
Unidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres. Estructura del Sistema Nacional de Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres. Bogotá: UNGRD. Recuperado de http://portal.gestiondelriesgo.gov.co/Paginas/Estructura.aspx
Wood, T. (2015). “El desarrollo de la protección provisional en África”. Migraciones forzadas (49), pp. 23-25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authorship of scientific works
In order to establish the authorship of the scientific works, the Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana considers that within its publications it is understood as an author:
- Who participated in the formulation of the problem and the hypothesis.
- Who conceptualized, created, designed, studied, reviewed, analyzed or interpreted the data.
- Who participated in the creative elaboration or the manuscript, or edition of the statistical analysis.
- Who played a leading role in the final version of the work or wrote a portion of the text.
- Who participated in the interpretation of the results.
- Who is the principal investigator of the research project and has generated the central idea of the entire manuscript.
- Who has the ability to explain and defend portions of work or study in public or academic places" (CNRSI, 2008).
- Who is a co-author in the work for having participated in any of the stages of the research in any of the previous items (Official Journal of the European Union, 2005) [1]
[1] Law 93 of 1998, judgment C-1023/12 of the Colombian Constitutional Court- 14. At first, the judgment in question carried out a complete study on the constitutional protection of copyright, based on its consecration in article 61 Political Constitution of Colombia 1991 Thus, it established the following rules in this regard:
14.1. From the national and international regulations on the subject, it is concluded that the legal protection of copyright falls on all those creations of the spirit, in the scientific, literary or artistic field, whatever the genre, form of expression, and regardless of the literary or artistic merit, or its destination. Within this protection, and in the aforementioned terms, books, brochures and other writings are included, without excluding any species. 14.2. Copyright contains two types of prerogatives: moral rights, which are related to the faculty of the creator, as a natural person, so that his work is known and maintains its integrity and ownership, so they are personal, extra-patrimonial, imprescriptible, inalienable, and inalienable. Moral rights, in this sense, deal with (i) the right to disclose the work; (ii) the right to recognition of intellectual paternity; (iii) the right to respect and integrity of the work, preventing unauthorized modifications to it; and (iv) the right of withdrawal, which allows the author to withdraw it from the trade.
On the other hand, the author's economic rights have, as its name implies, economic content and are concentrated in the payment to the creator or the natural or legal person who owns the rights for those activities that involve the exploitation of the protected work. Among the variables of these faculties are (i) the right of material reproduction; (ii) the right of non-material public communication, representation, public execution and broadcasting; and (iii) the transformation, translation, adaptation and musical arrangement, as well as any other form of use of the work. Intellectual property rights. Employers and / or funders must ensure that researchers benefit, at any stage of their careers, from the possible exploitation of their R&D results through adequate legal protection, especially in the area of intellectual property rights protection and of copyright. Policies and practices should specify the rights that correspond to researchers and / or, where appropriate, their employers or other interested parties, including external commercial or industrial entities, as envisaged possibly under specific collaboration agreements or other types agree. Co-authorship. When evaluating staff, institutions should positively value co-authorship as it demonstrates a constructive approach to research practice. Therefore, employers and / or funders must develop strategies, practices and procedures that offer researchers, including those who are at the beginning of their careers, the necessary conditions so that they can enjoy the right to be recognized, mentioned and / or cited, within their actual contributions, as co-authors of reports, patents, etc. or publish the results of their own research, independently of their supervisors ("The Commission of the European Communities", 2005).
