Retos de las clínicas jurídicas frente a la atención de migrantes con enfoque diferencial de género
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24142/indis.v5n10a1Keywords:
Human rights, legal clinics, migrants, genderAbstract
Clinical legal education has allowed integrating in a transversal way the reflection, prob- lematization and attention of different social problems of the time, knowledge and ap- proaches that enrich the formation process. The approach of problems from the gender differential approach has allowed, from the experience of the clinic of the Autonomous University of Bucaramanga, to transform the vision about how a phenomenon is lived depending on the gender construction of the participants. This experience allows us to justify the need to promote a transversal approach with a gender differential approach to provide better care to the population that migrates, which constitutes a challenge in the face of the multiple needs of the population and the lack of training of the popula- tion, different agents that intervene in the early care process. The purpose of the paper will be to justify, from a theoretical perspective, the practical need to incorporate the differential gender approach in the attention of migrants. For this, a conceptual location will be developed first, later some situations susceptible of application of the approach will be characterized and finally some recommendations will be formulated.
References
Agatón, I. (2017). Sí Adelita se fuera con otro. Del feminicidio y otros asuntos. Bogotá, Colombia: Temis S.A.
Amorós, C. (1990). Violencia contra las mujeres y pactos patriarcales. En: V. Maquieira y C. Sánchez (Comps.), Violencia y sociedad patriarcal. Madrid: Editorial Pablo Iglesias
Antick, P. (2016). Despertar la responsabilidad colectiva: el género como herramienta de análisis. En: Género y Sociedad. Bucaramanga: Universidad Industrial de Santander, pp. 21–34.
Beauvoir, (2010). El segundo sexo. Buenos Aires: Debolsillo.
Bonilla, D. (2018). Consultorios jurídicos: Educación para la democracia. En: Abogados y justicia social. Derecho de interés público y clínicas jurídicas, pp. 17–110.
Colombia, Corte Constitucional (26 de octubre de 2005) Sentencia T-1090/2005 [M.P Clara Inés Vargas Hernández].
Díaz, M. T. La perspectiva de género en la formación del profesorado de música REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, vol. 3, núm. 1, 2005, pp. 570–577
Fraser, Nancy. (1997). Iustitia interrupta. Reflexiones críticas desde la posición post socialista, Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre.
Jaramillo, I. (2000). Estudio preliminar. En West, R. Género y teoría del Derecho. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes, Instituto Pensar, Siglo de Hombre Editores, 51–52.
Londoño, B. (2016). Los cambios que requieren las clínicas jurídicas iberoamericanas. Estudio de caso en seis países de la región. En: Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado nueva serie, año XLIX, núm. 146, mayo-agosto de 2016, pp. 119–148
Goyez, I. e Izquierdo, Z. (2015). La clínica jurídica con perspectiva de género. Una estrategia para la equidad de género y la humanización del derecho. En: El interés público en América Latina. Reflexiones desde la educación legal clínica y el trabajo probono. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad del Rosario, Facultad de Jurisprudencia, Centro de Enseñanza y Aprendizaje – CEA-.
Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados (ACNUR), Naciones Unidas, Tendencias Globales 2013 (2014). Puede consultarse en: www.unhcr.org/5399a14f9.html.
Susen, S. (2010). Los Movimientos sociales en las sociedades complejas. En C. Bascon- zuelo, T. Morel, & S. Susen, Ciudadanía territorial y movimientos sociales. Historia y nuevas problemáticas en el escenario latinoamericano y mundial (pp. 149-226). Río Cuarto Ediciones del ICALA.
Woolf, V. (2013). Tres Guineas. Barcelona, España: Lumen.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authorship of scientific works
In order to establish the authorship of the scientific works, the Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana considers that within its publications it is understood as an author:
- Who participated in the formulation of the problem and the hypothesis.
- Who conceptualized, created, designed, studied, reviewed, analyzed or interpreted the data.
- Who participated in the creative elaboration or the manuscript, or edition of the statistical analysis.
- Who played a leading role in the final version of the work or wrote a portion of the text.
- Who participated in the interpretation of the results.
- Who is the principal investigator of the research project and has generated the central idea of the entire manuscript.
- Who has the ability to explain and defend portions of work or study in public or academic places" (CNRSI, 2008).
- Who is a co-author in the work for having participated in any of the stages of the research in any of the previous items (Official Journal of the European Union, 2005) [1]
[1] Law 93 of 1998, judgment C-1023/12 of the Colombian Constitutional Court- 14. At first, the judgment in question carried out a complete study on the constitutional protection of copyright, based on its consecration in article 61 Political Constitution of Colombia 1991 Thus, it established the following rules in this regard:
14.1. From the national and international regulations on the subject, it is concluded that the legal protection of copyright falls on all those creations of the spirit, in the scientific, literary or artistic field, whatever the genre, form of expression, and regardless of the literary or artistic merit, or its destination. Within this protection, and in the aforementioned terms, books, brochures and other writings are included, without excluding any species. 14.2. Copyright contains two types of prerogatives: moral rights, which are related to the faculty of the creator, as a natural person, so that his work is known and maintains its integrity and ownership, so they are personal, extra-patrimonial, imprescriptible, inalienable, and inalienable. Moral rights, in this sense, deal with (i) the right to disclose the work; (ii) the right to recognition of intellectual paternity; (iii) the right to respect and integrity of the work, preventing unauthorized modifications to it; and (iv) the right of withdrawal, which allows the author to withdraw it from the trade.
On the other hand, the author's economic rights have, as its name implies, economic content and are concentrated in the payment to the creator or the natural or legal person who owns the rights for those activities that involve the exploitation of the protected work. Among the variables of these faculties are (i) the right of material reproduction; (ii) the right of non-material public communication, representation, public execution and broadcasting; and (iii) the transformation, translation, adaptation and musical arrangement, as well as any other form of use of the work. Intellectual property rights. Employers and / or funders must ensure that researchers benefit, at any stage of their careers, from the possible exploitation of their R&D results through adequate legal protection, especially in the area of intellectual property rights protection and of copyright. Policies and practices should specify the rights that correspond to researchers and / or, where appropriate, their employers or other interested parties, including external commercial or industrial entities, as envisaged possibly under specific collaboration agreements or other types agree. Co-authorship. When evaluating staff, institutions should positively value co-authorship as it demonstrates a constructive approach to research practice. Therefore, employers and / or funders must develop strategies, practices and procedures that offer researchers, including those who are at the beginning of their careers, the necessary conditions so that they can enjoy the right to be recognized, mentioned and / or cited, within their actual contributions, as co-authors of reports, patents, etc. or publish the results of their own research, independently of their supervisors ("The Commission of the European Communities", 2005).
