Proposal for the teaching of constitutional law. Towards a theory of its juridical critic studies
Keywords:
constitutional law, teaching, learning, legal cultureAbstract
In this paper we would like to briefly question the legal basis for the study of this discipline and the methodological and conceptual orientations of its “teaching”. The questions that guide this analysis are: what can be the prospects of discussion for transforming learning? and what elements would be crucial to change the ways of reasoning and argumentation on this matter during the teaching / learning?
The training areas respond to symbolic and ritual codes [2] that shape the ways of teaching / learning to think, reason and argue. From this consideration, this article argues that by reinventing those dimensions may change its epistemology and policy and democratic grounds in which they are built. Finally, without wishing to interfere with the virtuous cycle of academic freedom and university mission, I suggest some programmatic and pragmatic elements to create a constitutional law in levels of undergraduate and graduate, where we can’t ignore that their intimate truths born for the control of power and the power of control.
Purposive vision of this work is designed according to the projections and prospects of the Constitutional State requiring other legal training and the construction of other regulatory and state paradigm.
References
Aragón, M. (2007). “La Constitución como paradigma”. En M. Carbonell, Teoría del neoconstitucionalismo. Ensayos escogidos (p. 37). Madrid, España: Trotta.
Ávila, M. G. (2014). “Enseñar a aprender en Derecho. La importancia de la formación docente del formador”. Academia, (24), 111-128.
Ayala, D. E. (2013). “Aportes trialistas para un diseño curricular integrado”. Academia, (22), 181-196.
Bordieu, P. (2000). “La fuerza del derecho. Hacia una sociología del campo jurídico”. En P. Bordieu y G. Teubner, La fuerza del Derecho (p. 159). Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones Uniandes.
Carbonell, M. (2016). “La importancia de la educación continua”. Recuperado de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQWfDH3C-Xg [vídeo].
Córdova, P. (2016). Derecho procesal constitucional. Estudios críticos de doctrina, dogmática, argumentación y jurisprudencia. Quito, Ecuador: Corporación de Estudios y Publicaciones.
Córdova, P., Cueva, L. y Romo, M. P. (2014). “Debates y desafíos en la enseñanza del derecho en Ecuador”. Cuadernos del Contrato Social por la Educación-Ecuador, (10).
D’ Auria, A. (2014). “Modernidad, universidad y pensamiento crítico”. Academia, (23), 35-49.
De Baggis, G. F. (2014). “Solicitud de hábeas corpus para la orangután Sandra. Comentario a propósito de la Sentencia de la Cámara Federal de Casación Penal de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, de 18 de diciembre de 2014”. Recuperado de http://www.derechoanimal.info/images/pdf/GFB-Habeas-Corpus-Sandra.pdf
De Fazio, F. (2013). “La enseñanza del derecho en los Estados Constitucionales”. Academia, (22), 197-213.
Estrella, P. (ed.). (2001). La educación legal en el Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador: Corporación Editora Nacional/Projusticia/Asociación Ecuatoriana de Facultades de Jurisprudencia.
Fairstein, G. A., Scavino, N., Frontini, M., Torre, V. A., Duhalde, M. C. y Potenze, M. (2014). “La construcción del conocimiento en Ciencias Jurídicas y su valor para la enseñanza”. Academia, (23), 181-190.
Ferreyra, R. G. (2010). “Cultura y derecho constitucional. Entrevista a Peter Haberle”. Estudios Constitucionales, 8(1), 379-398 [Recuperado de http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-52002010000100014&script=sci_arttext].
Ferreyra, R. G. (2013). “Enfoque sobre el mundo del Derecho. Constitución y Derechos Fundamentales”. Academia, (21), 246.
Gargarella, R. (2008). “Introducción”. En R. Gargarella (coord.), Teoría y crítica del derecho constitucional (p. 4). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Abeledo Perrot.
Pérez, J. (2010). Curso de Derecho Constitucional. Madrid, España: Marcial Pons.
Pezzetta, S. (2014). “Ejercicio sobre las opiniones y expectativas de los estudiantes de Derecho. Entre la conformidad y la crítica”. Academia, (24), 211-234.
Rabinovich-Berkman, R. (2015). “La triste historia del vikingo Sigurd Haraldsson o de cómo si algo anda mal suele convenir cambiarlo”. En Letra, (4), 5-11.
Salgado, J. (2013). Manual de formación en género y derechos humanos. Quito, Ecuador: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador/Corporación Editora Nacional.
Tushnet, M. (2008). “La inevitable globalización del Derecho Constitucional”. El papel cambiante de los tribunales superiores en un mundo internacionalizado [taller realizado en la Academia de Derecho Internacional de La Haya]. La Haya, Países Bajos.
Wray, A. (1974). “Derecho y realidad en la enseñanza legal en una sociedad subdesarrollada”. Revista de Derecho, (32) [Recuperado de http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/6155/6179].
Normativa
Ecuador. Consejo de Educación Superior. “Reglamento de Régimen Académico”. Registro Oficial N.o 136, segundo suplemento de 3 de diciembre de 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authorship of scientific works
In order to establish the authorship of the scientific works, the Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana considers that within its publications it is understood as an author:
- Who participated in the formulation of the problem and the hypothesis.
- Who conceptualized, created, designed, studied, reviewed, analyzed or interpreted the data.
- Who participated in the creative elaboration or the manuscript, or edition of the statistical analysis.
- Who played a leading role in the final version of the work or wrote a portion of the text.
- Who participated in the interpretation of the results.
- Who is the principal investigator of the research project and has generated the central idea of the entire manuscript.
- Who has the ability to explain and defend portions of work or study in public or academic places" (CNRSI, 2008).
- Who is a co-author in the work for having participated in any of the stages of the research in any of the previous items (Official Journal of the European Union, 2005) [1]
[1] Law 93 of 1998, judgment C-1023/12 of the Colombian Constitutional Court- 14. At first, the judgment in question carried out a complete study on the constitutional protection of copyright, based on its consecration in article 61 Political Constitution of Colombia 1991 Thus, it established the following rules in this regard:
14.1. From the national and international regulations on the subject, it is concluded that the legal protection of copyright falls on all those creations of the spirit, in the scientific, literary or artistic field, whatever the genre, form of expression, and regardless of the literary or artistic merit, or its destination. Within this protection, and in the aforementioned terms, books, brochures and other writings are included, without excluding any species. 14.2. Copyright contains two types of prerogatives: moral rights, which are related to the faculty of the creator, as a natural person, so that his work is known and maintains its integrity and ownership, so they are personal, extra-patrimonial, imprescriptible, inalienable, and inalienable. Moral rights, in this sense, deal with (i) the right to disclose the work; (ii) the right to recognition of intellectual paternity; (iii) the right to respect and integrity of the work, preventing unauthorized modifications to it; and (iv) the right of withdrawal, which allows the author to withdraw it from the trade.
On the other hand, the author's economic rights have, as its name implies, economic content and are concentrated in the payment to the creator or the natural or legal person who owns the rights for those activities that involve the exploitation of the protected work. Among the variables of these faculties are (i) the right of material reproduction; (ii) the right of non-material public communication, representation, public execution and broadcasting; and (iii) the transformation, translation, adaptation and musical arrangement, as well as any other form of use of the work. Intellectual property rights. Employers and / or funders must ensure that researchers benefit, at any stage of their careers, from the possible exploitation of their R&D results through adequate legal protection, especially in the area of intellectual property rights protection and of copyright. Policies and practices should specify the rights that correspond to researchers and / or, where appropriate, their employers or other interested parties, including external commercial or industrial entities, as envisaged possibly under specific collaboration agreements or other types agree. Co-authorship. When evaluating staff, institutions should positively value co-authorship as it demonstrates a constructive approach to research practice. Therefore, employers and / or funders must develop strategies, practices and procedures that offer researchers, including those who are at the beginning of their careers, the necessary conditions so that they can enjoy the right to be recognized, mentioned and / or cited, within their actual contributions, as co-authors of reports, patents, etc. or publish the results of their own research, independently of their supervisors ("The Commission of the European Communities", 2005).
