Victims of criminal gangs, access barriers around the full compensation: case Santa Marta-Colombia
Keywords:
criminal gangs, access barriers, victims, reparation, effective access, human rightsAbstract
Victims of emerging criminal gangs in Colombia, face difficulties in accessing to the single registry of victims and thus to an effective reparation. In response to this reality, this article research describes and characterizes the legal and social barriers that prevent or expand access to full compensation of victims in the Capital and Historic District of Santa Marta, is shown as barriers project from the gestation of public policy for the repair, i.e. Law 1448 of 2011, until its implementation. It builds on the victims of forced displacement attended at the legal office of the University of Magdalena in the period 2011 to 2015. The qualitative approach was used and it used as techniques, the literature review, implementation of the ethnographic method, analysis of laws, jurisprudence and analysis of statistical data provided by the database called amphora Legal Option chapter Santa Marta program. The article below is presented; generally it takes the results and the key aspects of the investigation conducted by the legal clinic in conjunction with the Human Rights Center at the University of Magdalena.
References
Arboleda, C. (2015). Continuidad de la estrategia paramilitar en Colombia luego de la desmovilización de las AUC. Recuperado de http://repository.javeriana.edu.co/bitstream/10554/16776/1/ArboledaCasallasSergioHipolito2015.pdf
Atheortúa-Arredondo, C. y Fuentes-Becerra, D. (2013). “Efectos desapercibidos de la sentencia t/025 de 2004: sobre la necesidad de una aproximación cualitativa a las realidades de la población en situación de desplazamiento”. Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional, (22), 121-145 [Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/ilrdi/n22/n22a05.pdf].
Cano, M. y Caro, O. (2008). “Las grandes dificultades de la reparación administrativa de las víctimas de violencia en Colombia. Algunos comentarios respecto a la implementación del decreto 1290 de 2008”. Revista Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, 41(115), 451-497 [Recuperado de http://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/4012891.pdf].
Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica (2013). ¡Basta ya! Colombia: memorias de guerra y dignidad. Bogotá, Colombia: Imprenta Nacional [Recuperado de http://www.centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/descargas/informes2013/bastaYa/basta-ya-memorias-guerra-dignidad-new-9-agosto.pdf].
Comisión Nacional de Reparación y Reconciliación (2007). “Disidentes, rearmados y emergentes: ¿Bandas criminales o tercera generación paramilitar?”. Recuperado de http://repository.oim.org.co/bitstream/20.500.11788/73/1/COL-OIM%200190.pdf
Consejo Noruego para los Refugiados (2010). Los caminantes invisibles. La experiencia de la sentencia T-025 de 2004 y sus autos de seguimiento. Bogotá, Colombia: NCR Colombia.
Corporación Arco Iris (2011). Informe política y violencia, las cuentas no son tan alegres. Recuperado de http://viva.org.co/cajavirtual/svc0290/articulo06.html
Díaz, M. (2014). Análisis de la reparación moral de las víctimas en casos de desplazamiento forzado, en el conflicto armado colombiano (tesis de grado para obtener el título de Especialista en Procedimiento Penal Militar y Constitucional, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada). Bogotá, Colombia [Recuperado de http://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/bitstream/10654/12983/1/ARTICULO%2022%20DE%20OCTUBRE%20DE%202014.pdf].
Escobar, A., Gualdrón, J. C., Gualdrón, M., Gutiérrez, L. y Legarda, M. (2006). Barreras de acceso a programas y proyectos de seguridad alimentaria para población en situación de desplazamiento de la UPZ San Francisco en Ciudad Bolívar (tesis de grado para obtener el título de Especialista en Planeación Gestión y Control del Desarrollo Social, Universidad de la Salle). Bogotá, Colombia [Recuperado de http://repository.lasalle.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10185/1943/TM93.06%20E18b.pdf?sequence=2].
Fisas, V. (1994). Alternativas de defensa y cultura de paz. Madrid, España: Editorial Fundamentos.
Fisas, V. (1998). Cultura de paz y gestión de conflictos. Barcelona. España: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica. En E. Hernández (2010), “Aproximación teórica a los significados de la mediación en conflictos armados” (p. 1). Reflexión política, (24) [Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/html/110/11017129013/].
García, E. (2016). “Santos avisa al Clan Úsuga que no le dará trato político”. Recuperado de http://www.elheraldo.co/nacional/santos-avisa-al-clan-usuga-que-no-le-dara-trato-politico-252048
Guber, R. (2001). La etnografía. Método, campo y reflexibidad. Bogotá, Colombia: Norma [Recuperado de https://antroporecursos.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/guber-r-2001-la-etnografia.pdf].
International Crisis Group (2012). “Desmantelar los nuevos grupos armados ilegales en Colombia: lecciones de un sometimiento. Informe sobre América Latina N.°41, 8 de junio de 2012”. Recuperado de: http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/latin-america/colombia/041-dismantling-colombias-new-illegal-armed-groups-lessons-from-a-surrender-spanish.pdf
Misión de Observación Electoral (2015). “Mapas y factores de riesgo de la MOE”. Recuperado de http://moe.org.co/home/doc/Observatorio/Mapas%20de%20Riesgo%20electoral%202015.pdf
Meier, J. (s.f.). “¿Por qué son víctimas las personas desplazadas?”. Recuperado de http://www.javeriana.edu.co/Facultades/Medicina/vidas_moviles/Documentos/victimasdesplazados.pdf
Muñoz F., Herrera, J., Molina B. y Sánchez, S. (2005). Investigación de la paz y los Derechos Humanos desde Andalucía, Granada. Granada, España: Instituto de la Paz y los Conflictos.
Observatorio Nacional de Paz (2013). Dinámicas recientes del conflicto armado en el departamento del Magdalena. Bogotá́, Colombia: s.e.
Olarte, C. (2014). “Las elecciones en Colombia y el discurso de la guerra”. Recuperado de http://www.americaeconomia.com/analisis-opinion/las-elecciones-en-colombia-y-el-discursode-la-guerra
Plan de Desarrollo (s.f.). Recuperado de: http://www.santamarta.gov.co/docs/PDD.pdf
Prieto, C. A. (2013). “Las Bacrim y el crimen organizado en Colombia”. Recuperado de http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/la-seguridad/09714.pdf
Red de Derechos Humanos del suroccidente colombiano Francisco Isaías Cifuentes (2015). “Vacíos, incertidumbres y certezas sobre la normatividad en materia de víctimas del conflicto armado colombiano: hacia el foro nacional de víctimas”. Recuperado de http://www.reddhfic.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=723:vacios-incertidumbres-y-certezas-sobre-la-normatividad-en-materia-de-victimas-del-conflicto-armado-colombiano-hacia-el-foro-nacional-de-victimas&catid=130:actualidad-2014&Itemid=303
Restrepo, A. y Aponte, D. (2009). Guerra y violencias en Colombia. Herramientas e interpretaciones. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Pontifica Javeriana [Recuperado de http://www.cerac.org.co/assets/files/guerrayviolencias/10_Neoparamilitarismo_en_Colombia.pdf].
Roth, A. (1999). Etat et Politiques Publiques en Amérique Latine. Ginebra, Suiza: Universidad de Ginebra.
“Santa Marta, bajo el pánico y terror” (2016). Recuperado de http://www.hoydiariodelmagdalena.com.co/noticias/ciudad6426.html
Unidad de Víctimas (2015). “Reporte de información por departamento”. Recuperado de http://cifras.unidadvictimas.gov.co/caracterizacion/?tema=56
“Víctimas del conflicto en Colombia ya son ocho millones” (2016). Recuperado de http://www.eltiempo.com/politica/justicia/cifras-de-las-victimas-del-conflicto-armado-en-colombia/16565045
Normas y leyes
L. 1448/2011. Diario Oficial N.o 48096.
Corte Constitucional
CConst, T 265/2010. J. C. Henao.
CConst, Auto 119/2013. L. E. Vargas.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authorship of scientific works
In order to establish the authorship of the scientific works, the Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana considers that within its publications it is understood as an author:
- Who participated in the formulation of the problem and the hypothesis.
- Who conceptualized, created, designed, studied, reviewed, analyzed or interpreted the data.
- Who participated in the creative elaboration or the manuscript, or edition of the statistical analysis.
- Who played a leading role in the final version of the work or wrote a portion of the text.
- Who participated in the interpretation of the results.
- Who is the principal investigator of the research project and has generated the central idea of the entire manuscript.
- Who has the ability to explain and defend portions of work or study in public or academic places" (CNRSI, 2008).
- Who is a co-author in the work for having participated in any of the stages of the research in any of the previous items (Official Journal of the European Union, 2005) [1]
[1] Law 93 of 1998, judgment C-1023/12 of the Colombian Constitutional Court- 14. At first, the judgment in question carried out a complete study on the constitutional protection of copyright, based on its consecration in article 61 Political Constitution of Colombia 1991 Thus, it established the following rules in this regard:
14.1. From the national and international regulations on the subject, it is concluded that the legal protection of copyright falls on all those creations of the spirit, in the scientific, literary or artistic field, whatever the genre, form of expression, and regardless of the literary or artistic merit, or its destination. Within this protection, and in the aforementioned terms, books, brochures and other writings are included, without excluding any species. 14.2. Copyright contains two types of prerogatives: moral rights, which are related to the faculty of the creator, as a natural person, so that his work is known and maintains its integrity and ownership, so they are personal, extra-patrimonial, imprescriptible, inalienable, and inalienable. Moral rights, in this sense, deal with (i) the right to disclose the work; (ii) the right to recognition of intellectual paternity; (iii) the right to respect and integrity of the work, preventing unauthorized modifications to it; and (iv) the right of withdrawal, which allows the author to withdraw it from the trade.
On the other hand, the author's economic rights have, as its name implies, economic content and are concentrated in the payment to the creator or the natural or legal person who owns the rights for those activities that involve the exploitation of the protected work. Among the variables of these faculties are (i) the right of material reproduction; (ii) the right of non-material public communication, representation, public execution and broadcasting; and (iii) the transformation, translation, adaptation and musical arrangement, as well as any other form of use of the work. Intellectual property rights. Employers and / or funders must ensure that researchers benefit, at any stage of their careers, from the possible exploitation of their R&D results through adequate legal protection, especially in the area of intellectual property rights protection and of copyright. Policies and practices should specify the rights that correspond to researchers and / or, where appropriate, their employers or other interested parties, including external commercial or industrial entities, as envisaged possibly under specific collaboration agreements or other types agree. Co-authorship. When evaluating staff, institutions should positively value co-authorship as it demonstrates a constructive approach to research practice. Therefore, employers and / or funders must develop strategies, practices and procedures that offer researchers, including those who are at the beginning of their careers, the necessary conditions so that they can enjoy the right to be recognized, mentioned and / or cited, within their actual contributions, as co-authors of reports, patents, etc. or publish the results of their own research, independently of their supervisors ("The Commission of the European Communities", 2005).
