Litigio en red para la defensa de derechos de la población migrante y refugiada en Colombia
A propósito de las obligaciones derivadas de la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24142/indis.v5n10a4Keywords:
Decree 1067 de 2015, nullity due to unconstitutionality, American Convention on Human Rights, due process, judicial guaranteesAbstract
The unique normative about recognition of refugee condition in Colombia is Decree 1067 of 2015. Its content serves, in principle, to dispositions preview about Convention on the Status of Refugees and the Cartagena Declaration. How part of reader litigation, the Assistance Legal Program for People with International Protection Necessities, which have five universities articulated in Colombia, between them the University of Rosario, have found that, in decree mentioned, exists several elements that limit complete exercise of requesters rights, and affect the declaration integrality about recognition request. From there, the purpose of to promote the nullity declaration for unconstitutionality, of some considerate articles, because do not attend to final objective of international compromises and state obligations references to this procedure. Attending to this context, the Assistance Legal Program of Rosario, through a pedagogic process and articulated of investigation, to pretend consolidate the judicial arguments, in particular, there related with administrative due process. This exercise will be constructed thought of debate spaces where will studied advisory opinions, Interamerican Court of Human Rights jurisprudence, thematic informs of Interamerican Commission of Human Rights and observations issues in relation with the due process guaranty how pillar of administrative actuations, obligation derivate of American Convention which Colombia is signatory.
References
Arletazz F. (2015). El caso familia Pacheco Tineo: expulsión de extranjeros, niñez migrante y asilo. Anuario de Derechos Humanos, (11), 85-94. ISSN: 0718-2058.
Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados (ACNUR). (2018). ACNUR: Los 100 puntos de Brasilia. Aportes de América Latina y el Caribe para el Pacto Mundial sobre Refugiados, 20 de febrero de 2018. Disponible en esta dirección: http://www.refworld.org.es/docid/5a9dc0f44.html [Accesado el 15 de Septiembre de 2018]
Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados (ACNUR). (2014). “Declaración de Brasil: Un marco de Cooperación y Solidaridad Regional para Fortalecer la Protección Internacional de las Personas Refugiadas, Desplazadas y Apátridas en América Latina y el Caribe”. Disponible en: http://www.acnur.org/fileadmin/Documentos/BDL/2014/9867.pdf
Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas. (1990). Convención internacional sobre la protección de los derechos de todos los trabajadores migratorios y sus familias. Resolución 45/158. Disponible en: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/cmw_SP.pdf
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (1993). Informe anual Nº27/93. Caso
092. Decisión de la comisión respecto a la admisibilidad. Disponible en https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/93span/cap.III.canada11.092.htm
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2000). Informe sobre la situación de los derechos humanos de los solicitantes de asilo en el marco del sistema canadiense de determinación de la condición de refugiado. OEA/Ser.L/V/II.106. Doc. 40 rev. Disponible en: http://www.cidh.org/Migrantes/Canad%C3%A1%20%282000%29.pdf
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2015). Derechos humanos de migrantes, refugiados, apátridas, víctima de trata de personas y desplazados internos: Normas y estándares del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos humanos. OEA/ OEA/Ser. L/V/II
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2011). Informe de Fondo 136/11, Caso 12.474, Familia Pacheco Tineo (Bolivia), 31 de octubre de 2011.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (s.f). Cuadernillo de jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos Nº2: Personas situación de migración o refugio.
Corte IDH. Caso tibi Vs. Ecuador (Excepciones preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y costas). Sentencia de 07 de septiembre de 2004.
Corte IDH. (2003). Opinión CONSULTIVA OC–18/03. Solicitada por los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Condición jurídica y derecho de los migrantes indocumentados. Disponible en: http://www.acnur.org/fileadmin/Documentos/BDL/2003/2351.pdf?view=1
Corte IDH. (2014). Opinión Consultiva OC–21/14, Solicitada por la República Argentina, la República Federativa de Brasil, la República de Paraguay y la República oriental del Uruguay, Derechos y garantías de niñas y niños en el contexto de la migración y/o necesidad de protección internacional. Disponible en: http://www.acnur.org/5b6ca2644.pdf
Declaración de Cartagena sobre Refugiados. (1984). “Adoptado por el Coloquio sobre la Protección Internacional de los Refugiados en América Central, México, Panamá: Problemas Jurídicos y Humanitarios”, celebrada en Cartagena, Colombia, del 19 al 22 de noviembre de 1984”. Disponible en http://www.acnur.org/5b076ef14.pdf
Decreto 1067 de 2015. (2015). “Por medio del cual se expide el Decreto Único Reglamentario del Sector Administrativo de Relaciones Exteriores”. 26 de mayo de 2015. DO: 49.523 de 2015.
Murillo, J. (2008). La protección internacional de los refugiados en el sistema interamericano de derechos humanos. Disponible en: http://www.acnur.org/fileadmin/Documentos/BDL/2008/6098.pdf?view=1
Organización de los Estados Americanos (OEA). Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos “Pacto San José” Costa Rica, 22 de noviembre de 1969. Depósito de Colombia en 1985, de junio 21. Disponible en: https://www.oas.org/dil/esp/tratados_b32_convencion_americana_sobre_derechos_humanos.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authorship of scientific works
In order to establish the authorship of the scientific works, the Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana considers that within its publications it is understood as an author:
- Who participated in the formulation of the problem and the hypothesis.
- Who conceptualized, created, designed, studied, reviewed, analyzed or interpreted the data.
- Who participated in the creative elaboration or the manuscript, or edition of the statistical analysis.
- Who played a leading role in the final version of the work or wrote a portion of the text.
- Who participated in the interpretation of the results.
- Who is the principal investigator of the research project and has generated the central idea of the entire manuscript.
- Who has the ability to explain and defend portions of work or study in public or academic places" (CNRSI, 2008).
- Who is a co-author in the work for having participated in any of the stages of the research in any of the previous items (Official Journal of the European Union, 2005) [1]
[1] Law 93 of 1998, judgment C-1023/12 of the Colombian Constitutional Court- 14. At first, the judgment in question carried out a complete study on the constitutional protection of copyright, based on its consecration in article 61 Political Constitution of Colombia 1991 Thus, it established the following rules in this regard:
14.1. From the national and international regulations on the subject, it is concluded that the legal protection of copyright falls on all those creations of the spirit, in the scientific, literary or artistic field, whatever the genre, form of expression, and regardless of the literary or artistic merit, or its destination. Within this protection, and in the aforementioned terms, books, brochures and other writings are included, without excluding any species. 14.2. Copyright contains two types of prerogatives: moral rights, which are related to the faculty of the creator, as a natural person, so that his work is known and maintains its integrity and ownership, so they are personal, extra-patrimonial, imprescriptible, inalienable, and inalienable. Moral rights, in this sense, deal with (i) the right to disclose the work; (ii) the right to recognition of intellectual paternity; (iii) the right to respect and integrity of the work, preventing unauthorized modifications to it; and (iv) the right of withdrawal, which allows the author to withdraw it from the trade.
On the other hand, the author's economic rights have, as its name implies, economic content and are concentrated in the payment to the creator or the natural or legal person who owns the rights for those activities that involve the exploitation of the protected work. Among the variables of these faculties are (i) the right of material reproduction; (ii) the right of non-material public communication, representation, public execution and broadcasting; and (iii) the transformation, translation, adaptation and musical arrangement, as well as any other form of use of the work. Intellectual property rights. Employers and / or funders must ensure that researchers benefit, at any stage of their careers, from the possible exploitation of their R&D results through adequate legal protection, especially in the area of intellectual property rights protection and of copyright. Policies and practices should specify the rights that correspond to researchers and / or, where appropriate, their employers or other interested parties, including external commercial or industrial entities, as envisaged possibly under specific collaboration agreements or other types agree. Co-authorship. When evaluating staff, institutions should positively value co-authorship as it demonstrates a constructive approach to research practice. Therefore, employers and / or funders must develop strategies, practices and procedures that offer researchers, including those who are at the beginning of their careers, the necessary conditions so that they can enjoy the right to be recognized, mentioned and / or cited, within their actual contributions, as co-authors of reports, patents, etc. or publish the results of their own research, independently of their supervisors ("The Commission of the European Communities", 2005).
