Interdisciplinarity on probation area of environmental cases A proposal from the experience of Public Actions Group
Keywords:
right to a healthy environment, Public Action Group (PAG), interdisciplinarity, evidential difficulties, access to justice, public interestAbstract
The main objective of this paper is to show how the evidentiary difficulties in environmental issues taken by the Group of Public Shares of the Rosario’s University, in the framework of its strategic litigation and clinical legal education are largely related to the absence of an interdisciplinary approach to the decree, practice and evaluate evidence by the judge. This lack has effects on the rights intended to protect the actions of environmental, within which rights are fundamental in nature, such as access to the administration of justice, and groups such as the right to a healthy environment.
To expose these evidential difficulties, three cases are developed by the legal clinic, the first is the popular action brought on behalf of Sunrise Park in San Andrés, the second is the popular action brought against the gold mine called “La Colosa” in Cajamarca, and finally the popular action brought against the irregular issuance of pot in the municipality of la Calera is exposed.
Under the above difficulties, some proposals are made to generate changes in state institutions, for being more efficient and effective in designation and financing of expert opinions and execution of judicial inspections, among other relevant evidence means for the public interest.
References
Araújo, R. M. (2011). “Acceso a la justicia efectiva. Propuesta para fortalecer la justicia administrativa. Visión de derecho comparado”. Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 13.
Cuevas, A. (2014). “La Colosa afectaría páramos del Tolima”. El Espectador. Recuperado de http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/medio-ambiente/colosa-afectaria-paramos-del-tolima-articulo-466736
Jantsh, E. (1980). “Hacia la interdisciplinariedad y la trandisciplinariedad en la enseñanza”. Revista de la Educación Superior, (34), p.142.
Londoño, B., Guiza L. y Rodríguez C. D. (2015). “La judicialización de los conflictos ambientales: un estudio del caso de la cuenca hidrográfica del río Bogotá”. Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental, 31(2).
Minaberry, C. M. (2015). “El avance de la implementación de los Tribunales Ambientales en América Latina”. Revista Gestión y Ambiente, 18(2), p. 97.
Molina, C. A. (2012). “La Enseñanza Clínica del Derecho, presupuestos metodológicos y teóricos para la inclusión de la interdisciplinariedad en la formación jurídica”. Revista Ratio Juris, 7(15).
Plumer, M. C. (2013). “Los Tribunales Ambientales se completa la reforma a la institucionalidad ambiental”. Anuario de Derecho Público UDP, pp. 298-315
Sarmiento, J. (2009). La participación y la interdisciplinariedad como elementos de gestión ambiental-educativa para la construcción de lineamientos curriculares de educación ambiental. Estudio de caso Gimnasio Vermont. Localidad de Suba. Bogotá, Colombia: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Estudios Ambientales y Rurales.
Tilbury, D. y Hernández-Ramos, M. J. (2006). “Educación para el desarrollo sostenible, ¿nada nuevo bajo el sol?: consideraciones sobre cultura y sostenibilidad”. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, (40).
Jurisprudencia
Normas y leyes
L. 472/1998
L. 20600/2012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authorship of scientific works
In order to establish the authorship of the scientific works, the Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana considers that within its publications it is understood as an author:
- Who participated in the formulation of the problem and the hypothesis.
- Who conceptualized, created, designed, studied, reviewed, analyzed or interpreted the data.
- Who participated in the creative elaboration or the manuscript, or edition of the statistical analysis.
- Who played a leading role in the final version of the work or wrote a portion of the text.
- Who participated in the interpretation of the results.
- Who is the principal investigator of the research project and has generated the central idea of the entire manuscript.
- Who has the ability to explain and defend portions of work or study in public or academic places" (CNRSI, 2008).
- Who is a co-author in the work for having participated in any of the stages of the research in any of the previous items (Official Journal of the European Union, 2005) [1]
[1] Law 93 of 1998, judgment C-1023/12 of the Colombian Constitutional Court- 14. At first, the judgment in question carried out a complete study on the constitutional protection of copyright, based on its consecration in article 61 Political Constitution of Colombia 1991 Thus, it established the following rules in this regard:
14.1. From the national and international regulations on the subject, it is concluded that the legal protection of copyright falls on all those creations of the spirit, in the scientific, literary or artistic field, whatever the genre, form of expression, and regardless of the literary or artistic merit, or its destination. Within this protection, and in the aforementioned terms, books, brochures and other writings are included, without excluding any species. 14.2. Copyright contains two types of prerogatives: moral rights, which are related to the faculty of the creator, as a natural person, so that his work is known and maintains its integrity and ownership, so they are personal, extra-patrimonial, imprescriptible, inalienable, and inalienable. Moral rights, in this sense, deal with (i) the right to disclose the work; (ii) the right to recognition of intellectual paternity; (iii) the right to respect and integrity of the work, preventing unauthorized modifications to it; and (iv) the right of withdrawal, which allows the author to withdraw it from the trade.
On the other hand, the author's economic rights have, as its name implies, economic content and are concentrated in the payment to the creator or the natural or legal person who owns the rights for those activities that involve the exploitation of the protected work. Among the variables of these faculties are (i) the right of material reproduction; (ii) the right of non-material public communication, representation, public execution and broadcasting; and (iii) the transformation, translation, adaptation and musical arrangement, as well as any other form of use of the work. Intellectual property rights. Employers and / or funders must ensure that researchers benefit, at any stage of their careers, from the possible exploitation of their R&D results through adequate legal protection, especially in the area of intellectual property rights protection and of copyright. Policies and practices should specify the rights that correspond to researchers and / or, where appropriate, their employers or other interested parties, including external commercial or industrial entities, as envisaged possibly under specific collaboration agreements or other types agree. Co-authorship. When evaluating staff, institutions should positively value co-authorship as it demonstrates a constructive approach to research practice. Therefore, employers and / or funders must develop strategies, practices and procedures that offer researchers, including those who are at the beginning of their careers, the necessary conditions so that they can enjoy the right to be recognized, mentioned and / or cited, within their actual contributions, as co-authors of reports, patents, etc. or publish the results of their own research, independently of their supervisors ("The Commission of the European Communities", 2005).
