Clinical experience: school bullying prevention and care for reasons of sexual diversity and gender
Keywords:
bullying, educational institutions, gender, Clinical TeachingAbstract
The paper presented is intended to describe the significant experience in research training and students associated with the line of Gender and Law Legal Clinic on Human Rights and public interest of the Faculty of Law at the Autonomous University of Bucaramanga. In the text is exposed the linking to the Clinic , the selection of the problem under study, the design of the proposal, the most relevant normative, theoretical and conceptual references, subsequent implementation experiences and finally the initial findings of such pilot tests. It is evident how the link to the Legal Clinic has been a process that has significantly impacted the process of training in law of the participants in the line. Similarly it has favored the relationship with the environment by addressing real problems, since from its recognition of mainly social connotation, has been able to identify how in institutions of primary and secondary education are recurrent discriminatory behaviors for reasons of sexual orientation or gender duty without an adequate management and monitoring, which is an obstacle to security and enjoyment of rights.
References
Acosta, M. (2013). “Panorama general del bullying por homofobia”. En M. Acosta, L. Cuellar y J. Martínez, Colombia: el bullying por homofobia debe salir del clóset (pp. 5-15). Bogotá, Colombia – Washington, Estados Unidos: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID) y Fundación Sentiido [Recuperado de http://sentiido.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Bullying-por-homofobia-completo-ebook-final.pdf].
Álvarez, A., Lega, L., Paredes, M. y Vernon, A. (2006). “Estudio exploratorio sobre el fenómeno de bullying en la ciudad de Cali, Colombia”. Revista Latinoamericana de Niñez y Juventud, 6(1), 295-317.
Ardila, E. (2014). “Según encuesta, 235 alumnos de Bucaramanga pensaron en suicidarse por bullying”. Recuperado de http://www.vanguardia.com/santander/bucaramanga/286943-segun-encuesta-235-alumnos-de-bucaramanga-pensaron-en-suicidarse-por-bu
“A través del teatro buscan reducir el matoneo en Bucaramanga” (2015). Recuperado de http://www.vanguardia.com/area-metropolitana/bucaramanga/308257-a-traves-del-teatro-buscan-reducir-el-matoneo-escolar-en-bucar
Ávila-Toscano, J. H., Causado, K., Cogollo, N., Cuello, K. y Osorio, L. (2010). Conducta bullying y su relación con la edad, género y nivel de formación en adolescentes. Montería, Colombia: Universidad del Sinú Elías Bechara Zainum [Recuperado de http://oaji.net/articles/2015/1787-1438299619.pdf].
Calderón, J. (2011). Análisis y vínculos entre matoneo y vida social en Colombia. Una mirada a dos instituciones educativas y al sector Codito (tesis de maestría para obtener el título de Magíster en Educación, Universidad Nacional de Colombia). Bogotá, Colombia [Recuperado de http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/4378/1/868081.2011.pdf].
Calderón, M., Cortés, J. y Retamales, C. (2012). “Estudio descriptivo de los conocimientos y opiniones sobre sexualidad, bullying, homofobia y bullying homofóbico de los estudiantes de primer año medio de los liceos municipales de la Comuna de San Felipe de Aconcagua: Liceo Doctor Roberto Humeres Oyaneder y Liceo Bicentenario Cordillera. San Felipe, Chile: Universidad de Playa Ancha”. Recuperado de http://bibliotecadigital.indh.cl/bitstream/handle/123456789/615/TESIS%202.pdf?sequence=1
Cassiani, C., Cubides, A., Gómez, J. y Hernández, M. (2014). “Prevalencia de bullying y factores relacionados en estudiantes de bachillerato de una institución educativa de Cali, Colombia”. Revista de Salud Pública, 16(1), 14-16 [Recuperado de http://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rsap/v16n1/v16n1a02.pdf].
Cisneros, M. (2005). Lectura y escritura en la universidad. Una investigación diagnóstica. Pereira, Colombia: Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira.
Correa, L. (2010). “Introducción. La Enseñanza Clínica del Derecho, retos actuales de las facultades de Derecho”. En La Enseñanza Clínica del Derecho (pp. 13-18). Medellín, Colombia: Fondo Editorial Fundación Luis Amigó.
Corredor, M., Pérez, M. y Arbeláez, R. (2009). Estrategias de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Bucaramanga, Colombia: Universidad Industrial de Santander.
García, C. (2007). Diversidad sexual en la escuela. Dinámicas pedagógicas para enfrentar la homofobia. Bogotá, Colombia: Colombia Diversa [Recuperado de http://colombiadiversa.org/colombiadiversa/documentos/diversidad-en-la-escuela/documento-diversidad-sexual-en-la-escuela.pdf].
Londoño, B. (2003). “Las clínicas jurídicas de interés público en Colombia. Retos y posibilidades de una naciente experiencia”. En Clínicas de interés público y enseñanza del derecho (pp. 9-47). Santiago de Chile, Chile: Universidad Diego Portales.
Londoño, B. (2010). “Retos de la educación legal clínica en Iberoamérica. Consolider-Ingenio”. Recuperado de http://www.tiempodelosderechos.es/docs/jul13/retos.pdf
Malaver, C. (2015). “El Bullying también se vive en las universidades”. Recuperado de http://www.eltiempo.com/bogota/bullying-o-matoneo-en-universidades/15588466
Martínez, E. (2014). “Línea contra el matoneo recibe una denuncia diaria”. Recuperado de http://www.vanguardia.com/santander/bucaramanga/285687-linea-contra-el-matoneo-recibe-una-denuncia-diaria
Molina, C. (2012). “La Enseñanza Clínica del Derecho. Presupuestos metodológicos y teóricos para la inclusión de la interdisciplinariedad en la formación jurídica”. Ratio Juris, 7(15), 81-104.
Naciones Unidas-Derechos Humanos (2011). “Orientación sexual e identidad de género en el Derecho Internacional de los Derechos humanos”. Recuperado de www.acnudh.org
Narváez, V. y Salazar, O. (2012). “Carta de la Salud. Bullying, matoneo, intimidación o acoso escolar”. Recuperado de http://www.valledellili.org/media/pdf/carta-salud/CARTA_DE_LA_SALUD_ENERO_DIGItAL_2013.pdf
Pabón, A. y Aguirre, J. (2007). Justicia y derechos en la convivencia escolar. Bucaramanga, Colombia: Universidad Industrial de Santander.
Pabón, A., Carreño, M. y Goyes, I. (2014). Formación en Derecho basada en competencias. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad del Rosario.
Pérez, J. (1996). “Teorías críticas del Derecho”. En F. Laporta y E. Garzón (coords.), El derecho y la Justicia. Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía (pp. 87-104). Madrid, España: Editorial Trotta.
Pérez, J. (2007). “Teoría y práctica de la enseñanza del Derecho”. Academia: revista sobre enseñanza del derecho de Buenos Aires, (589), 85-189.
Pozo, J. (1999). Aprendices y maestros: la nueva cultura del aprendizaje. Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.
“Principios de Yogyakarta. Principios sobre la aplicación de la legislación internacional de derechos humanos en relación con la orientación sexual y la identidad de género” (2006). Recuperado de http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/principles_sp.pdfp
Quiroga, E. (2003). “El nuevo contexto educativo. La significación en el aprendizaje de la enseñanza”. Recuperado de http://www.uantof.cl/sed/contexto_educativo.htm
República de Colombia (1991). Constitución Política de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Legis.
Restrepo, B. (2012). “Conceptos y aplicaciones de la investigación formativa y criterios para evaluar la investigación científica en sentido estricto”. Recuperado de http://www.uned.ac.cr/paa/pdf%5CInvestigBernardoR.pdf
Vásquez, J. (2008). “Fundamentos para la creación de una clínica jurídica en la FUNLAM como apoyo en la enseñanza práctica del derecho”. Revista IIEC, 2(3), 11-21.
Vásquez, J. y Correa, L. (2009). “La Enseñanza Clínica del Derecho: transformando la forma de enseñar y ejercer el Derecho”. Studiositas, 3(1), 34-40.
Vásquez, J., Correa, L., Fergusson, A. y Molina, C. (2010). La Enseñanza Clínica del Derecho. Medellín, Colombia: Fondo Editorial Fundación Luis Amigó.
Normas y leyes
L. 115/1994.
L. 599/2000.
L. 1098/2006.
L. 1620/2013.
Corte Constitucional
CConst, T-124/1998. A. Martínez.
CConst, T-1017/2000. A. Martínez.
CConst, T -688/2005. R. Escobar.
CConst, T-478/2015. G. Ortiz.
Corte Suprema de Justicia
CSJ, T-3875842/2013. L. E. Vargas.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authorship of scientific works
In order to establish the authorship of the scientific works, the Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana considers that within its publications it is understood as an author:
- Who participated in the formulation of the problem and the hypothesis.
- Who conceptualized, created, designed, studied, reviewed, analyzed or interpreted the data.
- Who participated in the creative elaboration or the manuscript, or edition of the statistical analysis.
- Who played a leading role in the final version of the work or wrote a portion of the text.
- Who participated in the interpretation of the results.
- Who is the principal investigator of the research project and has generated the central idea of the entire manuscript.
- Who has the ability to explain and defend portions of work or study in public or academic places" (CNRSI, 2008).
- Who is a co-author in the work for having participated in any of the stages of the research in any of the previous items (Official Journal of the European Union, 2005) [1]
[1] Law 93 of 1998, judgment C-1023/12 of the Colombian Constitutional Court- 14. At first, the judgment in question carried out a complete study on the constitutional protection of copyright, based on its consecration in article 61 Political Constitution of Colombia 1991 Thus, it established the following rules in this regard:
14.1. From the national and international regulations on the subject, it is concluded that the legal protection of copyright falls on all those creations of the spirit, in the scientific, literary or artistic field, whatever the genre, form of expression, and regardless of the literary or artistic merit, or its destination. Within this protection, and in the aforementioned terms, books, brochures and other writings are included, without excluding any species. 14.2. Copyright contains two types of prerogatives: moral rights, which are related to the faculty of the creator, as a natural person, so that his work is known and maintains its integrity and ownership, so they are personal, extra-patrimonial, imprescriptible, inalienable, and inalienable. Moral rights, in this sense, deal with (i) the right to disclose the work; (ii) the right to recognition of intellectual paternity; (iii) the right to respect and integrity of the work, preventing unauthorized modifications to it; and (iv) the right of withdrawal, which allows the author to withdraw it from the trade.
On the other hand, the author's economic rights have, as its name implies, economic content and are concentrated in the payment to the creator or the natural or legal person who owns the rights for those activities that involve the exploitation of the protected work. Among the variables of these faculties are (i) the right of material reproduction; (ii) the right of non-material public communication, representation, public execution and broadcasting; and (iii) the transformation, translation, adaptation and musical arrangement, as well as any other form of use of the work. Intellectual property rights. Employers and / or funders must ensure that researchers benefit, at any stage of their careers, from the possible exploitation of their R&D results through adequate legal protection, especially in the area of intellectual property rights protection and of copyright. Policies and practices should specify the rights that correspond to researchers and / or, where appropriate, their employers or other interested parties, including external commercial or industrial entities, as envisaged possibly under specific collaboration agreements or other types agree. Co-authorship. When evaluating staff, institutions should positively value co-authorship as it demonstrates a constructive approach to research practice. Therefore, employers and / or funders must develop strategies, practices and procedures that offer researchers, including those who are at the beginning of their careers, the necessary conditions so that they can enjoy the right to be recognized, mentioned and / or cited, within their actual contributions, as co-authors of reports, patents, etc. or publish the results of their own research, independently of their supervisors ("The Commission of the European Communities", 2005).
