Arbitraje de Inversiones y Soberanía Estatal: Tensiones y Desafíos
Palabras clave:
arbitraje de inversiones, soberanía estatal, expectativas legítimas, estándares de protección a la inversión, poder regulatorioResumen
Este trabajo analiza cómo el arbitraje de inversiones afecta la soberanía estatal, permitiendo a inversionistas extranjeros cuestionar regulaciones nacionales. Señala que este sistema ha generado incertidumbre y falta de legitimidad debido a la ausencia de normas claras y la parcialidad de algunos árbitros. Además, critica la doctrina de las expectativas legítimas por limitar la capacidad regulatoria de los Estados. Como solución, propone mayor transparencia en el sistema y la creación de una Corte Multilateral de Inversiones, junto con el fortalecimiento del Estado de Derecho para atraer inversiones sin comprometer la autonomía estatal.
Citas
Ansari, A. y Raisi, L. (2018). International Standard of Investment in International Arbitration Procedure and Investment Treaties. En: Revista Jurídicas, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 11-35. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/3151
Ariz, E. (2021). Does the Lack of Binding Precedent in International Arbitration Affect Transparency in Arbitral Proceedings? En: University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review, Vol.29, No. 1, pp.47-94. https://repository.law.miami.edu/umiclr/vol29/iss1/10/
Barbosa, S. y Galarza, W. (2007). Arbitraje Internacional en Materia de Impuestos: La Cláusula de Excepción de Tributación. En: International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional, No.9, pp. 493-503. https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/internationallaw/article/view/13992
Biggs, J. (2021). The Scope of Investors´ Legitimate Expectations under the FET Standard in the European Renewable Energy Cases. En: ICSID Review. Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siaa047
Chen, R. (2019). Precedent and Dialogue in Investment Treaty Arbitration. En: Harvard International Law Journal, Vol.60, No. 1, pp. 47-94. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj60&div=5&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals
CNUDMI. (2020). Possible Reforms of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS). Appellate and Multilateral Court. UN Doc A/CN.9/WG.III/Add1. UNCINTRAL Working Group III. Enero de 2020. https://docs.un.org/en/A/CN.9/1004/add.1
Cristancho, F. (2023). International Investment Arbitration and Covid19. En: Bándi, G. y Pogácsás, A., eds. Law in Times of Crisis. Pp. 37-51. Primera edición. Budapest: Pázmány Press. https://jak.ppke.hu/uploads/articles/458015/file/Bandi_Pogacsas_Law_in_times_of_crisis_Jog_valsag_idejen_.pdf
Cristancho, F. (2023a). Legitimate Expectations in International Investment Law: A Threshold for Regulatory Power of States? En: Berníková, E., Pisar?íková, D. y Repiš?áková, D., eds. Law without Borders. Pp. 341-353. Primera Edición. Košice: ŠafárikPress. https://unibook.upjs.sk/img/cms/2023/pravf/pravo-bez-hranic.pdf
Douglas, Z. (2006). Nothing if Not Critical for Investment Treaty Arbitration: Occidental, Eureko and Methanex. En: Arbitration International, Vol.22, No. 1, pp. 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/22.1.27
European Commission. (2015) Multilateral Investment Court Project. Disponible en: https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/enforcement-and-protection/multilateral-investment-court-project_en
Franck, S. (2005). The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decision. En: Fordham Law Review, Vol.73. No. 4, pp. 1521 ?1625. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol73/iss4/10/
Franck, S. (2007). Empirically Evaluating Claims About Investment Treaty Arbitration. En: North Carolina Law Review, Vol.86, pp. 1-87. https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol86/iss1/2/
García, J. (2022). Indeterminacy, Ideology and Legitimacy in International Investment Arbitration: Controlling Private Networks of Legal Governance. En: International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Vol.35, pp.1967-1994. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-021-09819-9
Giorgetti, C. (2014). Who Decides Who Decides in International Investment Arbitration. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol.35, No.2, pp. 431-486. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jil/vol35/iss2/3/
Giorgetti, C., Ratner, S., Dunoff, J., Hamamoto, S., Nottage, L., Schill, S. and Waibel. (2021). Independence and Impartiality of Adjudicators in Investment Dispute Settlement: Assessing Challenges and Reforms Options. En: Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 21, pp. 441- 474. https://brill.com/view/journals/jwit/21/2-3/article-p441_8.xml
Guzmán, A. (1997). Why LDCs Sign Treaties That Hurt Them: Explaining The Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties. En Virginia Journal International Law, Vol.38, pp.639-688. https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1116105?ln=en&v=pdf
Henckels, C. (2023). Justifying the Protection of Legitimate Expectations in International Investment Law: Legal Certainty and Arbitrary Conduct. En: ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, siac027, pp. 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siac027
Langford, M., Behn, D., y Hilliren, R. (2017). The Ethics and Empirics of Double Hatting. En: ESIL Reflections, European Society of International Law, Vol. 6, No. 1. (en línea). https://esil-sedi.eu/post_name-118/
Langford, M., Behn, D. y Létourneau-Tremblay, L. (2021). Empirical Perspective on Investment Arbitration: What do We Know? Does it Matter? En: Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 21, pp. 188-250. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit21&div=12&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals
OECD.(2004). Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law. OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2004/03. OECD Publishing. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/675702255435
Potestá, M. (2013). Legitimate expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and Limits of a Controversial Concept. En: ICSID Review, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 88-122. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/sis034
Sand, P. (2012) Conflict and Conflicts in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Ethical Standards for Counsel. En: Rovine, A., ed. Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation. Pp. 28-49. Primera edición. Nueva York: Brill.
Salacuse, J. (2015). The Law of Investment. Segunda edición. Oxford: Oxford International Law Library.
Vadi, V. (2021). Crisis, Continuity and Change in International Investment Law and Arbitration. En: Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol.42, No. 2, pp. 321-367. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol42/iss2/4/
Víg, Z. (2021). Legitimate Expectations in the Arbitral Practice of Green Energy Cases Under the Energy Charter Treaty. En: Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 62, No.2, pp. 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2022.00347
Zeyl, T. (2011). Charting the Wrong Course: The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law. En: Alberta Law Review, Vol.49, No.1, pp. 203-235. https://albertalawreview.com/index.php/ALR/article/view/131
CASOS
American Manufacturing & Trading, Inc. (AMT) (USA) v. Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93/1, Award (21 February 1997). https://www.italaw.com/cases/76
Biwater Gauff v. The Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22, Award (24 July 2008). https://www.italaw.com/cases/157
CMS Gas Transmission Company v. The Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award (12 May 2005). https://www.italaw.com/cases/288
Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Award (22 May 2007). https://www.italaw.com/cases/401
LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp., and LG&E International, Inc .v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1, Award (25 July 2007). https://www.italaw.com/cases/621
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A v. Republic of Chile, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, Award (25 May 2003). https://www.italaw.com/cases/717
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. The Republic of Ecuador, LCIA Case No. UN3467, Award (1 July 2004). https://www.italaw.com/cases/761
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Republic of Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award (11 September 2007). https://www.italaw.com/cases/812
Philip Morris Brands Sàrl, Philip Morris Products S.A. and Abal Hermanos S.A. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7, Award (8 July 2016). https://www.italaw.com/cases/460
Saluka Investments B.V. v. The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Award (17 March 2006). https://www.italaw.com/cases/961
Southern Pacific Properties (Middle East) Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/84/3, Award (20 May 1992). https://www.italaw.com/cases/3300
Técnicas Medioambientales (Tecmed), S.A. v. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/2, Award (29 May 2003). https://www.italaw.com/cases/1087
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Felipe Andrés Cristancho Escobar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La rivista consente all'autore (s) di mantenere i diritti di pubblicazione senza restrizioni.
Le journal permet à l'auteur (s) de conserver les droits de publication sans restrictions.
The journal allows the author (s) to retain publication rights without restrictions.
La revista le permite al autor(es) retener los derechos de publicación sin restricciones
Die Zeitschrift ermöglicht es dem / den Autor (en), Veröffentlichungsrechte ohne Einschränkungen zu behalten.
A revista permite que os autores mantenham os direitos de publicação sem restrições.
