Principles of pure accounting

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24142/rvc.n17a5

Keywords:

Pure accounting, formalization, axiomatic, phenomenon.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide plot elements to justify the need to arrive at an accounting pure, understood as a social science independent of the field of application, substantially independent of its measurement, valuation and classification. Pretend a disquisition between form and content, in order to separate what substantial accounting and that this Do not be tied to any branch of knowledge. Advocates also for the method axiomatic for its formalization.


Pure accounting, longing for many academics who look beyond the practical part of this, doing its abstraction, seeking autonomy, as the other sciences have it, it is essentially independent of the law, the economics, mathematics, statistics. It is not servitude of the right, as It has been affirmed at times.


Formalize accounting is a condition sine qua non to be pure, that universalize with the deductive method, gives coherence and avoids conventionalisms, dogmas and unrelated models yes. Accounting should not differ depending of the field of application.


There are accounting developments that, for ignorance, they have not crystallized in formalization to get to accounting pure. It is expected to create restlessness in the community accountant, so that discipline resumes the scientific method and do not anquilose, as a characteristic of science is to be a knowledge system in development, under some of the methods scientists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pedro Pablo Salazar Carvajal, Politécnico Jaime Isaza Cadavid

Contador público con wxperiencia práctica de 25 años. Tres años docente de cátedra de Calculo diferencial e Investigación de operaciones. Docente Politécnico Jaime Isaza Cadavid.
ppsc_1@hotmail.com

References

Balzer, W., & Mattessich, R. (2000). Formalizing the Basis of Accounting. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 75, 99-126.

Blanché, R. (1955). La axiomática. Santiago de Chile: Escuela de Filosofía, Universidad ARCIS.

Carlson, M. L., & Lamb, J. W. (1981). Constructing a Theory of Accounting an Axiomatic Approach. The Accounting Review, 56, 554-572.

Comité de Normas Internacionales de Contabilidad. (2013). Norma Internacional de Contabilidad 7 (NIC 7). Recuperado de https://www.mef.gob.pe/contenidos/conta_publ/con_nor_co/no_oficializ/nor_internac/ES_GVT_IAS07_2013.pdf

Kedrov, M. B., & Spirkin, A. (1968). La ciencia. México: Grijalbo.

López Corrales, F. J., Pedrosa Rodríguez, M. A., & Mareque Álvarez-Santullano, M. (2011). Novedades del Nuevo Plan General de Contabilidad Pública en el ámbito económico-patrimonial. Partida Doble, 228, 24-35.

Mattessich, R. (1957), Towards a general and axiomatic foundation of accountancy-With an introduction to the matrix formulation of accounting systems. Accounting Research, 8(4), 328-355.

Mattessich, R. (2002). Contabilidad y métodos analíticos. Buenos Aires: La Ley.

Mattessich, R. (2003). Estructuralistas: Formalizando la Base de la Contabilidad. Contaduría Universidad de Antioquia, 42, 31-35.

Mepham, M. J. (1988). Matrix-Based Accounting: A Comment. Accounting and Business Research, 18(72), 375-378.

Quesada, F. J. (2004), Aproximación a la metodología de la ciencia. Cuenca: Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.

Published

2018-06-26

How to Cite

Salazar Carvajal, P. P. (2018). Principles of pure accounting. Revista Visión Contable, (17), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.24142/rvc.n17a5

Issue

Section

Articles